Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 08:58:36 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Patches for building with gcc 3.1 - tests chunk
In-Reply-To: <200206081838.g58Ic4A27084@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020609085736.12685Q-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Sat, 8 Jun 2002 nobody AT delorie DOT com wrote:

> > > It is IMHO better to leave the original text as a single string, and
> > > instead add \n\ at the end of each line.
> 
> Why is that so?

It's closer to the original code (which used a GCC extension).