From: Martin Stromberg <eplmst AT epl DOT ericsson DOT se>
Message-Id: <200205311152.NAA13181@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
Subject: Re: Patches for building with gcc 3.1 - tests chunk
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com (DJGPP-WORKERS)
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 13:52:40 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
In-Reply-To: <3CF78B52.23724.61E62F@localhost> from "pavenis@lanet.lv" at May 31, 2002 02:40:18 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Andris said:
> Don't report them to gcc-bugs AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org. Go to 

Why not? <http://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html> says:
"gcc-bugs is a relatively high volume list for bug reports and general
discussion about bugs in GCC. "

Should that list and/or text be removed?

>       http://gcc.gnu.org/gnats.html
> and use web form to report a bug. In this case somebody will have to
> close it. So it's rather likely it will be read.

Yes. But if I'm not sure it's a bug I prefer to get some feedback on
the matter. E. g. the useless warning about empty format string.

If feedback won't be provided, I stop there. If they can't be
bothered to read my questions, I can't be bothered to persue the
matter.


Right,

						MartinS