From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id: <10205301720.AA20808@clio.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: [Fix for v2.03 refresh] - djgpp.env
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 12:20:36 -0500 (CDT)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.05.10205300947510.22308-100000@ieva06> from "Andris Pavenis" at May 30, 2002 09:57:44 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Is it OK to check in included patch for DJGPP v2.03 refresh. It is
> applied already a rather long time ago for current CVS?

I have an updated version (cvs head) of djgpp.env in my work area
planned for the refresh.  My wife takes the kids on vacation next
Monday so I may have a chance to get some of the items on the list
moving forward again.