Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 10:37:54 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [Fix for v2.03 refresh] Re: Undefined reference to _finite
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.05.10205300947510.22308-100000@ieva06>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020530103625.12774A-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 30 May 2002, Andris Pavenis wrote:

> libm.a should be linked AFTER libstdcxx.a. 
> 
> Is it OK to check in included patch for DJGPP v2.03 refresh.

I don't see any reason why not.

The question that bothers me is whether this order can cause trouble 
outside RHIDE as well.  For example, does gpp.exe invoke the linker with 
those libraries in the correct order?  What about gxx.exe?