From: Martin Stromberg <eplmst AT epl DOT ericsson DOT se>
Message-Id: <200205300710.JAA11953@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
Subject: Re: Patches for building with gcc 3.1 - tests chunk
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 09:10:50 +0200 (MET DST)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020530075412.11104C-100000@is> from "Eli Zaretskii" at May 30, 2002 08:00:09 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Eli said:
> > -  urand = ((double)rand()) / RAND_MAX;
> > +  urand = ((double)(long)rand()) / RAND_MAX;
> 
> I don't understand the need for this change.  What's wrong with the 
> original code, exactly?

Nobody does right now, I think.

Flamebait: As gcc seems to like to emit useless warnings, perhaps this
is another one.


Right,

						MartinS