Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 13:51:41 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Andrew Cottrell <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: emacs under w2k
In-Reply-To: <002f01c2056b$f06cfff0$0102a8c0@acceleron>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020527135048.9356A-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 27 May 2002, Andrew Cottrell wrote:

> > > The testing shows that the command interpreter cmd.exe works fine, but
> the
> > > other command interpreter command.com does not work correctly.
> >
> > I'm not sure: all I need is that if the file dj204\djgpp.env exists that
> > both cmd.exe and command.com will invoke "@echo here".  Can you confirm
> > that this is the case?
> I tried again and command.com fails even with the quotes so it looks like
> cmd.exe (or bash?) should be used.

Sorry, I'm not following: which case of the two I mentioned fails?  And 
how exactly does it fail?