Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 12:55:18 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: emacs under w2k
In-Reply-To: <3CF0ACBE.A77834E7@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020526125433.29049A-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Sun, 26 May 2002, Richard Dawe wrote:

> > I seem to recall that some recent Windows version (W2K? XP?) doesn't
> > like this method, though.  Hmm.
> 
> Yes, I don't think it works reliably. See Andrew Cottrell's mail entitled "Re:
> Make 3.791 on Windows 2000 test" and dated Tue, 24 Jul 2001 22:28:43 +1000.

Thanks.  Andrew, does the text work on W2K/XP if I use a real file 
instead of nul?