Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 17:04:37 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <2950-Sat25May2002170437+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <200205251328.PAA07420@lws256.lu.erisoft.se> (message from Martin
	Stromberg on Sat, 25 May 2002 15:28:40 +0200 (MET DST))
Subject: Re: emacs under w2k
References:  <200205251328 DOT PAA07420 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Martin Stromberg <eplmst AT epl DOT ericsson DOT se>
> Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 15:28:40 +0200 (MET DST)
> 
> Perhaps I'm confused but if you want to build with LFNs you should
> extract with LFNs.

The problem in this case is that DJGPP doesn't support LFN, but the
shell which runs config.bat does.  We don't have such disparity on any
other supported platform: they all either have LFN throughout or
don't.

If you want to see similar problems on Windows 9X, set LFN=n, unzip
Emacs, and try to build it.  You will see a spectacular failure.