Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 12:50:21 +0100 From: Laurynas Biveinis X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.60h) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <80244689394.20020519125021@softhome.net> To: Eli Zaretskii CC: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re[6]: emacs under w2k In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 May 2002 10:49:45.0395 (UTC) FILETIME=[E3813030:01C1FF22] Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > You ended the disassembly prematurely, I think: the exception happened on > the very next line. Here's what follows the `cld' line: Uhm right, I've already had trouble understanding, how could 'cld' ever cause crashes... > So both crashes are somehow related to the 16-bit helper. It would be > interesting to know whether the other crash indeed happens inside the > 16-bit helper or not. See my other mail for some advice about avoiding > false alarms. As I wrote in my other mail, it seems like alarm is mostly true... > dos_alloc_ok is not an extern symbol, so it might be tricky. However, > I've just tried "break dos_alloc_ok", and it did work for me. I didn't > try to run Emacs with that breakpoint, though; do you mean that the > breakpoint seems to be set, but never breaks? Exactly. > As for setting a breakpoint by address, did you remember to prepend an > asterisk to the address, like this: > (gdb) b *0x1252 Yes I did. Laurynas