X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 22:39:23 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <9464-Thu16May2002223923+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <10205161914.AA17309@clio.rice.edu> (sandmann@clio.rice.edu)
Subject: Re: Malloc/free DJGPP code
References:  <10205161914 DOT AA17309 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
> Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 14:14:16 -0500 (CDT)
> 
> So negative arguments only work for the unixy sbrk,
> or standard sbrk for increments which don't step over a block 
> boundary.

You mean, they _could_ work, right?  Because I don't think we do that
now, even when the Unixy sbrk bit is set.