X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 08:29:27 +0300 (IDT) From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz AT is To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: emacs under w2k In-Reply-To: <200205152106.g4FL6XJ30273@envy.delorie.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 15 May 2002, DJ Delorie wrote: > > Which brings up, to me, "why does emacs replace malloc etc."? > > IIRC, so that when you delete a buffer it can return that memory to > the system rather than just put it on the free list. Of course, our sbrk doesn't support that, so this aspect is not important for DJGPP.