X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 10:34:38 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Malloc/free DJGPP code
In-Reply-To: <3CC35230.F6E4ED93@yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020422102917.11473M-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, CBFalconer wrote:

> I am impressed by the apparent NIH syndrome, and am not especially
> motivated to contribute further efforts.

Please don't jump to such extreme conclusions.  We all are busy people, 
and reviewing a non-trivial change in a library function of such 
importance is something that cannot be done without sufficient free time.

That's why contributors are encouraged to make changes that don't modify 
existing algorithms and data structures too much: such changes have 
better chances of being reviewed quickly.  This has nothing to do with 
NIH.

I appreciate your efforts, as I'm sure everyone else here does.

Thanks!