X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 21:17:21 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: "Richard Dawe" <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Message-Id: <1527-Sun14Apr2002211720+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <E16wnM6-0000kt-00@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
	(rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk)
Subject: Re: Namespace pollution
References:  <E16wnM6-0000kt-00 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 18:04:18 +0100
> From: "Richard Dawe" <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> I just thought I'd have a look at tests/libclink, to see if there was
> any new namespace pollution. Below is a diff to fix some of the pollution
> I saw. OK to commit next weekend?

I don't have any objections.

> We're currently polluting the namespace with brk.

Sorry, I don't understand where did you see that pollution.  AFAICS,
no library function calls `brk'.