X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f From: Martin Stromberg Message-Id: <200203071259.NAA21612@lws256.lu.erisoft.se> Subject: Re: Proposed readme.1st changes To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 13:59:40 +0100 (MET) In-Reply-To: <10203030232.AA12545@clio.rice.edu> from "Charles Sandmann" at Mar 02, 2002 08:32:10 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > *** z:readme.1st Thu Feb 22 07:44:10 2001 > --- c:\readme.1st Sat Mar 2 20:20:48 2002 > *************** services, so you don't need CWSDPMI in t > *** 111,123 **** > details, download faq*b.zip (the full FAQ list) and read Chapter 4, > "Where and What to Download". > > > Installation > ------------ > > 1. Create a directory for DJGPP, say C:\DJGPP. (WARNING: do NOT > install DJGPP in a directory C:\DEV, D:\DEV, etc., or in any of their > ! subdirectories: it will not work! See the FAQ for more details.) > > If you have version 1.x installed, it's best to delete the contents > of its `bin/' subdirectory or move it to another directory (not on > --- 111,128 ---- > details, download faq*b.zip (the full FAQ list) and read Chapter 4, > "Where and What to Download". > > + If you have Windows ME, 2000 or XP, images dated before December 2001 > + may not work properly, so make sure you get new distributions where > + possible if you are using a newer Windows release. > + > > Installation > ------------ > > 1. Create a directory for DJGPP, say C:\DJGPP. (WARNING: do NOT > install DJGPP in a directory C:\DEV, D:\DEV, etc., or in any of their > ! subdirectories: it will not work! See the FAQ for more details.) Do > ! not use a long directory name or one with spaces or special characters. Isn't "special character" a little vague. Perhaps nonalphanumeric is better? Right, MartinS