X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 09:21:02 +0200 (WET) From: Andris Pavenis X-Sender: pavenis AT ieva06 To: Martin Str|mberg Cc: DJGPP-WORKERS Subject: Re: More complaints from gcc 3.03 In-Reply-To: <200203021413.PAA04383@father.ludd.luth.se> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sat, 2 Mar 2002, Martin Str|mberg wrote: > More warnings from gcc 3.03. I didn't see these before because these > parts don't error on warnings. (There might be more of them.) > > make -C common > gcc ... -c dbgcom.c > dbgcom.c: In function `_set_break_DPMI': > dbgcom.c:254: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned What DJGPP version You're testing. I'm not seeing any similar warnings with my automated builds with gcc-3.0.4 cross-compiler under Linux. I only see 2 warnings ar these builds: i586-pc-msdosdjgpp-gcc -pipe ... -c dbgcom.c dbgcom.c:37: warning: `id' defined but not used i586-pc-msdosdjgpp-gcc -pipe ... -c expr.c /usr/share/bison.simple: In function `yyparse': /usr/share/bison.simple:285: warning: `yyval' might be used uninitialized in this function There are many warnings building djtzsXXX but it's a different stuff. So I think current CVS should be mostly OK regarding gcc-3.0.X. Andris