X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 18:17:35 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
Message-Id: <9003-Wed27Feb2002181735+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3C7D151E.28870.C81F03@localhost> (pavenis@lanet.lv)
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP port of GDB 5.1.1 uploaded
References:  <3C7D151E DOT 28870 DOT C81F03 AT localhost>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 17:19:26 +0200
> 
> GDB-5.1.1 seems to work rather nicely when I'm trying to step
> rather complex C++ program (with heavy use of STL) if it is compiled
> without optimisations and with DWARF2 debug info. If I compile ir using -O2
> and DWARF2 debug info things are much worse especially if GDB (or RHIDE) is 
> linked with CVS libc

If it's possible to demonstrate some of the problems with a relatively
short test program, I'd suggest to post that to gdb AT sources DOT redhat DOT com.

The head maintainer is going to cut the v5.2 release branch in a
couple of days, so if there are significant problems, now is the time
to complain about them.  It's possible that solving them will justify
a delay in starting the release cycle.

TIA