X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 09:05:14 +0200 (WET)
From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
X-Sender: pavenis AT ieva06
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc: Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com,
   ST001906 AT HRZ1 DOT HRZ DOT TU-Darmstadt DOT De
Subject: Re: conflicting types for bzero (gcc303)
In-Reply-To: <3069-Wed06Feb2002221302+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.05.10202070900520.6950-100000@ieva06>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> > From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
> > Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:05:59 -0600 (CST)
> > 
> > #if __GNUC__ >= 3
> > #define bcopy(s, d, n) memcpy(d, s, n)
> > #define bzero(s, n) memset(s, 0, n)
> > #else
> > void *	bcopy(const void *_a, void *_b, size_t _len);
> > void *	bzero(void *ptr, size_t _len);

I think we should use (untested yet)

#define bzero(s,n) __builtin_bzero(s,n)

for gcc-3.X

Andris


> > #endif
> > 
> > 
> > Or can the prototypes be removed completely with GCC 3.x if they are
> > built-in?
> 
> I think we should modify bzero and bcopy so that they fit the
> (universally accepted) prototypes GCC expects.
> 
> 
>