X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 16:58:38 +0200 (WET)
From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
X-Sender: pavenis AT ieva06
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Default output format
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020121164500.19512A-100000@is>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.05.10201211652010.10288-100000@ieva06>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> 
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Andris Pavenis wrote:
> 
> > > What version of Binutils was the first to support *(SORT(.dtors.*))? 
> > > If it's something very new, we could be breaking users who still use
> > > older Binutils.
> > 
> > Verified that binutils-2.9.1 did not accept *(SORT(*.dtors.*)) 
> 
> Thanks.  In that case, perhaps we should leave this out of djgpp.djl, and 
> have it only in the script distributed with GCC.
> 

So I'll try to keep script distributed with DJGPP port of GCC as near as
possible to builtin script from current binutils. We could be able to
stop distributing linker script with GCC If the things will be
stable enough for a rather long time span (perhaps 1-2 years)

Once more about inititial topic: should I change coff-go32-exe to
coff-go32 in this script? I don't think I should rerelease GCC-3.0.3
for DJGPP now as GCC-3.0.4 is currently planned after less than a month

Andris