X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
From: Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT epl DOT ericsson DOT se>
Message-Id: <200201161602.RAA15491@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
Subject: Re: Memory leaks fixes
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 17:02:18 +0100 (MET)
In-Reply-To: <3C458CDD.3BC17846@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> from "Richard Dawe" at Jan 16, 2002 02:23:25 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Richard said:
> Alexander Aganichev wrote:
> > Unfortunately that's not enough. There's deeper problems with memory
> > allocation. More proper fixes are included in my NLS patchset. I can't
> > extract them right now by myself because I'm currently in the business
> > trip until the middle of February.
> 
> Sure, there may be more memory problems. But is there anything wrong with
> these fixes? (Apart the fact that I haven't tested them with a realloc()
> failure yet.)

We strongly prefer to have orthogonal corrections feed to us
orthoganally. So if you have two problems (bugs in handling realloc()
failures vs. adding NLS functionality) send two batches of patches.


Right,

						MartinS