X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200201101620.RAA27328@father.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: LFN32 optimizations [was:  Re: Proposed lstat.c patch for Win2000/XP device bit fix
In-Reply-To: <10201101553.AA19444@clio.rice.edu> from Charles Sandmann at "Jan 10, 2002 09:53:14 am"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 17:20:51 +0100 (MET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to Charles Sandmann:
> > Perhaps this macro should be called "_is_ff_LFN32", in case we would
> > need a _is_ff_LFN macro sometime.
> 
> There is actually no difference, the LFN32 is just part of the 
> signature block set in findfirs.c - it could be any string (as long
> as it's consistent everywhere).  Changing the name would actually be
> more confusing.

But it really is LFN we're talking about, isn't? Not LFN32. Is that
supposed to mean LFN on a 32-bit OS? But then I suppose it get set on
plain DOZE with a LFN driver too. So that's not right either. I could
be wrong, though.


Right,

						MartinS