X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id: <10201041723.AA19013@clio.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: v2.03 update status
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 11:23:51 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To: <250B3114DA16D511B82C00E0094005F8055AC825@MSGWAW11> from "=?iso-8859-2?Q?Wojciech_Ga=B3=B1zka?=" at Jan 04, 2002 09:52:20 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> > From:	Martin Str|mberg [SMTP:ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se]
> > 
> > I was planning on testing it on a W95 (A, without FAT32) system, so if
> > we could wait another week it would be great.

No FAT32 feature changes were included in the refresh - it should behave
the same as V2.03.  Do you you have some reason to believe that it would
behave differently?

Wojciech added:
> I'd like to wait a week too
> Which version of Windows is worh checking most ? 

I've done heavy testing under Windows 2000.  Medium testing under Win 95 OSR2.
Light testing under NT, DOS, W98, XP.  I haven't tested under ME.  The refresh
should fix problems under ME with LFN=n (or booted in DOS mode).  

More testing with the LFN TSR under NT and Windows 2000 (or XP) would probably 
be a good idea - these show combinations of the correct os version which does
get checked for in the Win2K patches - so might follow different paths.

I still think it's ready for release - and I'll be working with DJ to
move the refresh to Simtel hopefully next week.  The fact that 500+
testers have seen lots of fixes but no new problems ...