X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 21:27:09 -0500
Message-Id: <200112130227.fBD2R9p31541@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <200112130224.DAA03768@father.ludd.luth.se> (message from Martin
	Str|mberg on Thu, 13 Dec 2001 03:24:07 +0100 (MET))
Subject: Re: Description of stubs in develop.txiu
References:  <200112130224 DOT DAA03768 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> There's not much point mailing us proposed changes unless we have time
> to comment, is there?

A day is usually enough, and if you do have a complaint about a patch,
we can change it even after it's applied.  I hope by now people who
have checkin privs know the difference between a simple patch and a
potentially controvertial patch that needs more time.

You've seen the patch.  If you need more than a day to think about it,
just say so.  It's not a big deal.