X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 16:04:03 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Pierre Muller <muller AT cerbere DOT u-strasbg DOT fr>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Small configure problem.
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20011205130712.0134ad28@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1011205160315.8709A-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Pierre Muller wrote:

> > > Should the patterns be replaced by
> > >    i[34567]86-*-msdosdjgpp
> > > or by
> > >    i*86-*-msdosdjgpp ?
> >
> >I'd suggest i[3-9]86-*-msdosdjgpp.  But if other platforms use something 
> >different, I'd prefer to follow their example.
> 
> This isn't used anywhere yet,
> freebsd seems to have changed their pattern to
> i[34567]-*-frebsd[1234] in bfd directory already,
> otherwise most pattern simply
> are still with i[3456] (or even only i[345])
> or i*86.
> 
> So I don't know about your suggestion

Then use [34567].

> Humm, this then represents changing all i[34...] patterns.
> This is really the kind of thing where I am afraid of making some
> hidden error and committing wrong things....

Then don't change those patterns, they don't do any harm now anyway.