Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 19:22:52 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, wojciech DOT galazka AT polkomtel DOT com DOT pl,
   dennis-louie AT att DOT net, acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au
Subject: Re: df on NT/W2K (was: Re: statfs not ... 7302h and GNU df don't
In-Reply-To: <10111291626.AA16420@clio.rice.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1011129192151.15785F-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Charles Sandmann wrote:

> > Could you please check if the values returned by df for network drives are
> > correct when LFN driver is loaded ?
> 
> The values for df seem correct when the LFN driver is loaded on the systems
> I tested (I didn't know it already extended this interrupt, good job!)

At the time, I advised Wojciech to implement all of the LFN API, since 
DJGPP uses most of the functions it provides.