From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id: <10111290430.AA13297@clio.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: RESEND: Patch to computer st_blksize in struct stat
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 22:30:15 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To: <3C05577B.590A4890@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> from "Richard Dawe" at Nov 28, 2001 09:30:35 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> > Oh, btw, statfs is non-Posix, while stat and lstat are.  So we need to
> > make statfs a stub.  Did we do that?
> 
> Nope, but I'll fix that. 8)

Is there a procedure to check the libc for namespace clashes or are they all
hand identified?  It would be interesting to see how the CVS release is
doing on namespace cleanliness.