Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 19:57:50 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
Message-Id: <2110-Wed28Nov2001195749+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.1.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: dennis-louie AT att DOT net, acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <10111281623.AA18641@clio.rice.edu> (sandmann@clio.rice.edu)
Subject: Re: df on NT/W2K (was: Re: statfs not ... 7302h and GNU df don't work either)
References:  <10111281623 DOT AA18641 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:23:37 -0600 (CST)
> 
> This may be unrelated (I noticed a problem with df and never remembered to
> report it).  This is df under Windows NT using clio cvs built version
> (I see similar under Windows 2000 and with pre-cvs version).
> 
> Filesystem           1k-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
> Drive C:                999968    767936    232032  77% c:/
> Drive D:                992061         0    992061   0% d:/
> Drive E:                992061         0    992061   0% e:/
> \\HOUSTON\SANDMANN$     992061         0    992061   0% s:/
> \\SETI\C                992061    758016    234045  76% y:/
> \\HOUSTON\SOFTWARE      992061    952119     39942  96% z:/
> 
> C has no label.                    237,602,816 bytes free : size 1.2Gb
> D has no label.                  1,047,760,896 bytes free : size 2.8Gb
> E has no label.                  8,427,175,936 bytes free : size 8.5Gb
> S is Drive_F                   158,831,882,240 bytes free : size 186Gb !
> Y has no label.                  1,947,729,920 bytes free : size 21Gb
> Z is SOFTWARE                    1,330,528,256 bytes free : size 68Gb
> 
> For the C drive the free space is correct, but for most values over
> 1Gb the values seem "truncated".  The values for y: and z: on free space
> are just wrong - these are network drives.

I don't expect anything else on NT and its derivatives: the only
system call we have there available to us is function 36h of Int 21h,
which is limited to 2GB by design.