From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id: <10111281623.AA18641@clio.rice.edu>
Subject: df on NT/W2K (was: Re: statfs not ... 7302h and GNU df don't work either)
To: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il (Eli Zaretskii)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:23:37 -0600 (CST)
Cc: dennis-louie AT att DOT net (Dennis Louie),
   acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au (Andrew Cottrell), djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1011128103630.659K-100000@is> from "Eli Zaretskii" at Nov 28, 2001 10:36:51 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> > BTW, the clusters on drive problem also affects 'df' from GNU file utilities
> > (fil40b.zip).
> 
> How does it affect `df'?

This may be unrelated (I noticed a problem with df and never remembered to
report it).  This is df under Windows NT using clio cvs built version
(I see similar under Windows 2000 and with pre-cvs version).

Filesystem           1k-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
Drive C:                999968    767936    232032  77% c:/
Drive D:                992061         0    992061   0% d:/
Drive E:                992061         0    992061   0% e:/
\\HOUSTON\SANDMANN$     992061         0    992061   0% s:/
\\SETI\C                992061    758016    234045  76% y:/
\\HOUSTON\SOFTWARE      992061    952119     39942  96% z:/

C has no label.                    237,602,816 bytes free : size 1.2Gb
D has no label.                  1,047,760,896 bytes free : size 2.8Gb
E has no label.                  8,427,175,936 bytes free : size 8.5Gb
S is Drive_F                   158,831,882,240 bytes free : size 186Gb !
Y has no label.                  1,947,729,920 bytes free : size 21Gb
Z is SOFTWARE                    1,330,528,256 bytes free : size 68Gb

For the C drive the free space is correct, but for most values over
1Gb the values seem "truncated".  The values for y: and z: on free space
are just wrong - these are network drives.