Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:07:30 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
cc: dennis-louie AT att DOT net
Subject: Re: statfs not returning correct cluster size - 7302h and GNU df don't work either
In-Reply-To: <200111280902.KAA06042@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1011128110655.1193B-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Martin Stromberg wrote:

> > > Could you send me mail when the statfs problem is fixed?
> > 
> > Fixed--how?  AFAIU, `statfs' does on W2K the best job it could, given
> > the system calls implemented by W2K.  How can we fix that?
> 
> Shouldn't we improve the INT21, AX=0x7303(I'm not sure this is the
> right number) call to watch out for AL=0 as according to the comment
> in RBIL?

maybe, but would this ``fix'' the function in the way Dennis meant?