From: Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT epl DOT ericsson DOT se>
Message-Id: <200111280902.KAA06042@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
Subject: Re: statfs not returning correct cluster size - 7302h and GNU df don't work either
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:02:46 +0100 (MET)
Cc: dennis-louie AT att DOT net
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1011128103630.659K-100000@is> from "Eli Zaretskii" at Nov 28, 2001 10:36:51 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Eli said:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Dennis Louie wrote:
> > BTW, the clusters on drive problem also affects 'df' from GNU file utilities
> > (fil40b.zip).
> 
> How does it affect `df'?
> 
> > Could you send me mail when the statfs problem is fixed?
> 
> Fixed--how?  AFAIU, `statfs' does on W2K the best job it could, given
> the system calls implemented by W2K.  How can we fix that?

Shouldn't we improve the INT21, AX=0x7303(I'm not sure this is the
right number) call to watch out for AL=0 as according to the comment
in RBIL?


Right,

						MartinS