Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 10:31:47 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: "Dennis Louie" <dennis-louie AT att DOT net>
Message-Id: <1438-Fri23Nov2001103147+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.1.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <000801c173e3$de003310$0100a8c0@pentiumii> (dennis-louie@att.net)
Subject: Re: statfs not returning correct cluster size
References:  <000801c173e3$de003310$0100a8c0 AT pentiumii>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Dennis Louie" <dennis-louie AT att DOT net>
> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 21:58:24 -0800
> 
> Has anyone encountered a problem with statfs not returning the correct
> info in DJGPP 2.04 for Win2K/XP?  I'm running XP Pro.
> 
> I have partitions with 1K and 4K cluster sizes, but statfs returns 32K
> for both.  It also appears to be returning incorrect values for
> f_blocks, even for disk sizes under 2GB.  I seem to be getting the
> correct info for a 1.4MB floppy disk.

Thanks for reporting this.

Please step with a debugger into statfs, and see which system call
returns the incorrect info.  Then post the results here.