Message-ID: <000801c173e3$de003310$0100a8c0@pentiumii> From: "Dennis Louie" To: Subject: statfs not returning correct cluster size Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 21:58:24 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01C173A0.CEA49A20" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C173A0.CEA49A20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Has anyone encountered a problem with statfs not returning the correct = info in DJGPP 2.04 for Win2K/XP? I'm running XP Pro. I have partitions with 1K and 4K cluster sizes, but statfs returns 32K = for both. It also appears to be returning incorrect values for = f_blocks, even for disk sizes under 2GB. I seem to be getting the = correct info for a 1.4MB floppy disk. If you need additional information or have a workaround, please send = email to dennis-louie AT att DOT net (I'm not subscribed to djgpp-workers). Thanks, Dennis Louie ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C173A0.CEA49A20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

Has anyone encountered a problem with = statfs not=20 returning the correct info in DJGPP 2.04 for Win2K/XP? I'm = running XP=20 Pro.

I have partitions with 1K and 4K = cluster sizes, but=20 statfs returns 32K for both. It also appears to be returning = incorrect=20 values for f_blocks, even for disk sizes under 2GB. I seem to be = getting=20 the correct info for a 1.4MB floppy disk.

If you need additional information or = have a=20 workaround, please send email to dennis-louie AT att DOT net (I'm not = subscribed=20 to djgpp-workers).

Thanks,

Dennis Louie

------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C173A0.CEA49A20--