Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 08:44:18 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Message-Id: <9003-Tue20Nov2001084418+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.1.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3BF976C8.9048342@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Mon, 19 Nov 2001 21:16:56 +0000)
Subject: Re: RESEND: Patch to computer st_blksize in struct stat
References: <200111182235 DOT XAA21129 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <3BF976C8 DOT 9048342 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 21:16:56 +0000
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> Unix98 specifies that st_blksize should be a blksize_t not an off_t. Does
> anyone object to this change? Will it break source compatibility?

It shouldn't break source compatibility, but with today's picky
defaults for GCC warnings you can never know.  I think it's best to
write a short test program and see whether it compiles.