Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 08:23:16 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Message-Id: <3405-Tue20Nov2001082315+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.1.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3BF97E29.39FC7C7E@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Mon, 19 Nov 2001 21:48:25 +0000)
Subject: Re: Building a profiled version of libc
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1011119103715 DOT 8761F-100000 AT is> <3BF97E29 DOT 39FC7C7E AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 21:48:25 +0000
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> Presumably we want to compile mcount.c with the same options as the rest
> of the code, but without -pg and -a.

Yes.

> So should I add a new command to
> src/makefile.inc that defines a new XGCC - XGCC_NO_PG - to be used for
> mcount.c?

Yes, something like that.  Please put a comment there which explains
what files use this special variable, and why.