Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 13:37:52 -0500
Message-Id: <200111171837.fAHIbqh26037@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10111171757510.27163-100000@acp3bf> (message from
	Hans-Bernhard Broeker on Sat, 17 Nov 2001 18:03:30 +0100 (MET))
Subject: Re: Which 2.12.1 source and binary test zip file
References:  <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10111171757510 DOT 27163-100000 AT acp3bf>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


The Red Hat policy is to call it x.y.z-n where "n" is their Red Hat
specific stepping number.  So, 2.12-1 (well, 2.12-2 now) would be OK.
However, it's hard to encode that in a 8.3 filename and not be
ambiguous.

I think just calling it 2.12 would be fine.