X-Authentication-Warning: new-smtp2.ihug.com.au: Host p103-tnt3.syd.ihug.com.au [203.173.132.103] claimed to be acceleron Message-ID: <00fa01c16f62$0a522bc0$0a02a8c0@acceleron> From: "Andrew Cottrell" To: , "Eli Zaretskii" Cc: References: <004901c144fd$2d93f350$0a02a8c0 AT acceleron> <00bd01c16f5b$ae341340$0a02a8c0 AT acceleron> Subject: Re: Which 2.12.1 source and binary test zip file Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 23:18:29 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com All, I found that there is a which 2.13 and I have just finished updating to it. I have uploaded the 2.13.1 files to clio and deleted the 2.12.1 files and updated the html file to use the new files. Andrew ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Cottrell" To: "Eli Zaretskii" Cc: Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 10:32 PM Subject: Which 2.12.1 source and binary test zip file > Eli, > > I have produced a which 2.12.1 source and binary release that is based on > the GNU 2.12 plus the which.c changes for DJGPP and the patch that you sent > out in September. I called it 2.12.1 as it is not the GNU 2.12 release, but > a modified verison for DJGPP, is this okay? > > Both files are available at http://clio.rice.edu/djgpp/win2k/main.htm for > testing purposes. > > How do I produce the files that are needed to produce the doc package? I > could not see how to produce the files in the 2.11 doc package from the > makefile, I may have missed something. > > I have included DSM files, but I don't know if they are correct or not. > Could someone please check the DSM files out and send me updates if they are > wrong. > > Andrew > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andrew Cottrell" > To: "Eli Zaretskii" > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:31 AM > Subject: Re: which crashes > > > > > > I checked out the differences between Which 2.11 and 2.12 and the > > changes > > > > are with the man pages only. I couldn't see who produced the DJGPP > port > > as > > > > it has allot of DJGPP changes compared to the original which.c source. > > > > > > I have a few more complaints about the ported Which. For example, > > > there's no DJGPP-specific README anywhere in sight, and it looks like a > > > user is supposed to run "sh ./configure" to configure the package. > These > > > things shouldn't be left without saying them explicitly. > > > > > > > The next time I build the Which package for testing under WIn 2K > should > > I > > > > include these changes? > > > > > > I don't see any sense in producing a binary that is known to bomb... > > > > > > > I can also produce a source package as well. > > > > > > Any binary distribution should be accompanied by a source distribution. > > > If you produce the binary from modified sources, you should make those > > > modified sources available as well. That's a GPL requirement. > > > > If no one does it before me I will add this to me list of work to be done. > I > > will produce a Which source and binary release for Win 2K testing and then > > normalise the packages to be more like the normal DJGPP packages and while > I > > am at it I should update it to 2.12. > > > > If any one else wants to do this or starts this first could you please let > > me know so I do not waste my time. > > > > Thanks, > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > > > >