Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 18:52:09 +0200 (WET) From: Andris Pavenis X-Sender: pavenis AT ieva06 To: DJ Delorie Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: Old files in DJGPP distribution In-Reply-To: <200111051531.fA5FVQR03134@envy.delorie.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, DJ Delorie wrote: > > I removed the alphas/gcc stuff. Eli, what about the emacs in alphas? > > And I moved these out of the area also (but saved them in case we > change my mind): > > $ ls /home/dj/oldsimtel/ > bnu210a.zip bnu211a.zip bnu27d.zip bnu2951s.zip mak375b.zip > bnu210b.zip bnu211b.zip bnu27s.zip bnu2951x.zip mak375d.zip > bnu210d.zip bnu211s.zip bnu2951a.zip bsh203b.zip mak375s.zip > bnu210s.dif bnu211t.zip bnu2951b.zip bsh203d.zip mak379b.zip > bnu210s.zip bnu27b.zip bnu2951.README bsh203s.zip mak379s.zip Ok > > leaving behind: > > $ ls bnu* bsh* mak* > bnu2112a.zip bnu2112s.zip bsh204b.zip bsh204s.zip mak3791d.zip > bnu2112b.zip bnu2112t.zip bsh204d.zip mak3791b.zip mak3791s.zip > > And these redundancies: > > acnf 212 213 250 I think both 2.13 and 2.50 should stay. Most packages are still not compatible with 2.50 (for example gcc). Perhaps 2.12 can be removed > amake 13 14 15 The same. I think 1.4 and 1.5 both should stay. Perhaps 1.3 can be removed. I'm using 1.4 for GCC and other stuff. > bsn 128 129 > cvs 110 19 > em 1934 2005 > fil 316 40 > gcc 2952 2953 302 I don't know whether we should keep gcc-2.95.2. One reason for keeping is that *d.zip packages are generated for 2.95.2 burt not later versions > gdb 418 500 > gmp 311 311x > gpc 20b 2953 > gtxt 037 039 040 > gzp 124 124a > ind 224 225 > isp 3120 3206 > pat 21 253 > perl 552 561 > sed 118 302 3028