Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 19:23:11 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: _findfirst() patch (2)
In-Reply-To: <20011025120047.B29346@kendall.sfbr.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1011025192235.11516D@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, JT Williams wrote:

> I understand and accept your point about not wanting to clutter the
> diffs with formatting changes, especially when the diff is still under
> development as this one is.  But when the time comes to commit the
> changes, shouldn't we then add whatever formatting changes are required
> to bring the code into conformity with the djgpp style?

As a separate batch of changes, yes.