Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 14:27:08 +0300 (WET)
From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
X-Sender: pavenis AT ieva06
To: Andrew Cottrell <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Some build fixes for the test suite
In-Reply-To: <004401c15add$43e13730$0a02a8c0@acceleron>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.05.10110221416500.69240-100000@ieva06>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Andrew Cottrell wrote:

> This may be a stupid question, but it may help out in a month or two, but
> then again:
> 
> Are the beta GCC 3.01 tests okay or not? Has anyone used these tests with
> GCC 3.01?
> 

I have tried some of them, but not all. If somebody wants to try out I
could provide also archives of DJGPP build of recent CVS version of
gcc-3.1 development version.

Andris