Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 23:21:28 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
Message-Id: <8361-Mon15Oct2001232127+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <10110151959.AA17678@clio.rice.edu> (sandmann@clio.rice.edu)
Subject: Re: W2K/XP fncase
References:  <10110151959 DOT AA17678 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 14:59:20 -0500 (CDT)
> 
> Does fcntl.h seem a reasonable place to put a function like
> _is_DOS83 ?

Yes, I think so.

> Making . and .. legal is trivial.  Is this the right thing (they really
> aren't 8.3 names)?

I think it's best to say they are 8.3, since they can be used on DOS.