X-Authentication-Warning: new-smtp2.ihug.com.au: Host p40-tnt7.syd.ihug.com.au [203.173.144.40] claimed to be acceleron Message-ID: <002301c15474$c9bcd5e0$0a02a8c0@acceleron> From: "Andrew Cottrell" To: "Eli Zaretskii" Cc: References: <004601c153cd$c03c8f80$0a02a8c0 AT acceleron> <3401-Sat13Oct2001131608+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> Subject: Re: Info Issue with CVS LIBC Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 15:55:10 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com > > I tried the info.exe on Win2K and a small amount of testing showed that when > > pressing the cursor keys it looks like the ansi info is printed to the > > display. The cursor appears to almost move correctly, but printing the > > "^[[?" interferes with the movement. > > I already said several times here that it sounds like termios is > hooking input more aggressively than it should have. It also breaks > Less. > > > Anyone got any ideas where to start looking? > > I'd begin by finding out whether the termios init function gets > called, and why. The special termios hook should only be installed if > the program calls some termios function. IIRC, Info doesn't. The plot thickens and I am a stuck at to what to do next. This is what I did: 1) I traced the problem to the src/libc/dos/io/_read.c file to the read() function printing the characters. 2) Copied _read.c into the "texinfo4.0\info" directory and renamed it to read.c 3) Changed the read() function to ac_read() in both read.c and session.c 4) Modified the makefile to include read.c when creating ginfo.exe If I run ginfo.exe after doing the stuff above it works. If I change the ac_read() in session.c back to read() the ginfo.exe starts to print the "^[[?" info. I diffed read.c against the original _read.c and I only changed the function name. Any ideas on what to do next?