From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id: <10110110332.AA20364@clio.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: _findfirst() patch
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 22:32:13 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: ebotcazou AT libertysurf DOT fr
In-Reply-To: <200110091305.PAA22981@lws256.lu.erisoft.se> from "Martin Stromberg" at Oct 09, 2001 03:05:05 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

These functions look so identical to the current ones to me that it looks
like _find* could just be a wrapper around the current find* routines.
The return arguments and data structures might be different, but at a quick
glance I didn't see anything unique to either set of calls.  Making the
new routines a wrapper around the current ones would seem to minimize
low level code (improve maintenance), decrease code size.  Am I missing
something here?