From: Martin Stromberg Message-Id: <200110101444.QAA23628@lws256.lu.erisoft.se> Subject: Re: _findfirst() patch To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 16:44:49 +0200 (MET DST) In-Reply-To: <007601c150df$50c4fa20$3e8224d5@zephyr> from "Eric Botcazou" at Oct 09, 2001 06:23:55 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Hmm. Now that there will be two groups of the functions in the findfirst family (with almost identical names), perhaps there should be note saying "Do not use the the functions _findfirst, _findnext and _findclose" in the text of functions findfirst and findnext. And vice versa. Right, MartinS