Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 09:45:47 +0200 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu Message-Id: <2561-Mon01Oct2001094546+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <10109302021.AA13515@clio.rice.edu> (sandmann@clio.rice.edu) Subject: Re: mntent problem summary on Win2K/XP References: <10109302021 DOT AA13515 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann) > Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 15:21:17 -0500 (CDT) > > So is it better to display a drive which isn't ready on NT4, or not > display a drive which is ready on Windows 2000? The former, of course. But I hope we will find a better alternative.