Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:15:22 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: salvador <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
Message-Id: <3791-Fri28Sep2001161521+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3BB47B87.9B09F99A@inti.gov.ar> (message from salvador on Fri, 28
	Sep 2001 10:30:47 -0300)
Subject: Re: 2.03.1
References: <200109261644 DOT f8QGiWe22950 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3BB47B87 DOT 9B09F99A AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 10:30:47 -0300
> From: salvador <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
> 
> More or less related to it:
> The way you use 2.01, 2.02, 2.03, etc. gives the impression that it is
> 2.0.1, 2.0.2, 2.0.3, etc.

No, I think 2.03 is the same as 2.3, the zero is there to disambiguate
the file names when (or shall I say ``if'') we get to 2.10 and beyond.

v1.x, for example, got as far as 1.12.