Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 08:54:01 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: "H.Merijn Brand" <h DOT m DOT brand AT hccnet DOT nl>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu,
   Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi AT iki DOT fi>
Subject: Re: DJGPP & Windows 2000 weelky status report for 23-Sep-2001
In-Reply-To: <20010924235825.D963.H.M.BRAND@hccnet.nl>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010925085339.11596A-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, H.Merijn Brand wrote:

> > That would be different from any other x86 platform: they all use
> > i[34567]86.
> 
> These are *all* current options ? If so, perl5-porters will merge the uname
> detection from DJGPP and SCO, because they are almost the same now.

No, the i[3-7]86 is used for the CPU alone.  The full name of the
platform is i?86-pc-msdosdjgpp.  That's what the latest versions of
config.guess return for DJGPP.