Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:01:05 +0200
From: "H.Merijn Brand" <h DOT m DOT brand AT hccnet DOT nl>
To: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Subject: Re: DJGPP & Windows 2000 weelky status report for 23-Sep-2001
Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu,
   Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi AT iki DOT fi>
In-Reply-To: <9003-Mon24Sep2001215740+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
References: <10109241704 DOT AA15111 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <9003-Mon24Sep2001215740+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Mailer-Plugin: Cliche Inserter for Becky!2 Ver.0.02 Rev.0
Message-Id: <20010924235825.D963.H.M.BRAND@hccnet.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.00.07
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Mon 24 Sep 2001 21:57, "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> wrote:
> > From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
> > Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 12:04:33 -0500 (CDT)
> > 
> > Should we return pc686 from CVS library?  I don't see why i686 is any more
> > informative than pc686, especially if it breaks current code.
> 
> That would be different from any other x86 platform: they all use
> i[34567]86.

These are *all* current options ? If so, perl5-porters will merge the uname
detection from DJGPP and SCO, because they are almost the same now.

> Besides, it's too late: I think the master copy of config.guess and
> config.sub were already updated to support the new name.  Perl simply
> needs to resync with the latest versions, IIRC.


-- 
H.Merijn Brand    Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://www.amsterdam.pm.org/)
using perl-5.6.1, 5.7.1 & 623 on HP-UX 10.20 & 11.00, AIX 4.2, AIX 4.3,
     WinNT 4, Win2K pro & WinCE 2.11 often with Tk800.022 &/| DBD-Unify
ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/languages/perl/CPAN/authors/id/H/HM/HMBRAND/