Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 21:57:40 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
Message-Id: <9003-Mon24Sep2001215740+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, h DOT m DOT brand AT hccnet DOT nl
In-reply-to: <10109241704.AA15111@clio.rice.edu> (sandmann@clio.rice.edu)
Subject: Re: DJGPP & Windows 2000 weelky status report for 23-Sep-2001
References:  <10109241704 DOT AA15111 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 12:04:33 -0500 (CDT)
> 
> Should we return pc686 from CVS library?  I don't see why i686 is any more
> informative than pc686, especially if it breaks current code.

That would be different from any other x86 platform: they all use
i[34567]86.

Besides, it's too late: I think the master copy of config.guess and
config.sub were already updated to support the new name.  Perl simply
needs to resync with the latest versions, IIRC.