From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id: <10109240537.AA15106@clio.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: A new W2K problem: djtar
To: esa DOT peuha AT helsinki DOT fi
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 00:37:40 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il (Eli Zaretskii), djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.30.0109240820450.20848-100000@sirppi.helsinki.fi> from "Esa A E Peuha" at Sep 24, 2001 08:31:30 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> None that I can think of.  I don't remember why I wrote them like
> that, but now it doesn't make any sense to me why the null device
> should be opened with either O_CREAT or O_EXCL, so I think they should
> both be removed.

I've committed this change (2 places) in cvs.