From: "Juan Manuel Guerrero" <ST001906 AT HRZ1 DOT HRZ DOT TU-Darmstadt DOT De>
Organization: Darmstadt University of Technology
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:34:23 +0200
Subject: RE: gcc-3.01 seems unstable
In-reply-to: <250B3114DA16D511B82C00E0094005F8023FC196@MSGWAW11>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.54DE)
Message-ID: <7E133721B73@HRZ1.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 22 Sep 2001, Wojciech Galazka wrote:
> Under W2K, using the same compiler (gcc-3.01) and tools I was able to build
> the compiler but the process stops at libstdc++-v3, 
> the reason being that the files that should have been copied to 
> d:\djgpp.2\gnu\gcc-3.02\build.djg\i586-pc-msdosdjgpp\libstdc++-v3\include\i5
> 86-pc-msdosdjgpp\bits
> were copied to the main directory (that is d:\) instead
>
> (the -3.02 prefix is only to distinguish the other directory with a clean
> copy of gcc-3.01 sources)
>
> Perhaps the directory name is too long ?
I have not investigate the reason of this failure, but the build of libstdc++-v3
fails on linux (suse 7.2) for the same reasons too. It is impossible
to bootstrap gcc-3.01 out-of-the-box on linux.

Regards,
Guerrero, Juan Manuel