Message-ID: <250B3114DA16D511B82C00E0094005F8023FC196@MSGWAW11>
From: Wojciech Galazka <wojciech DOT galazka AT polkomtel DOT com DOT pl>
To: "'djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com'" <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: RE: gcc-3.01 seems unstable
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 11:32:22 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juan Manuel Guerrero [mailto:ST001906 AT HRZ1 DOT HRZ DOT TU-Darmstadt DOT De]
> 
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Wojciech Galazka:
> 
> > Then I tried to compile the gcc-3.01 itself assuming that 
> if it were to
> > crash it will. I got several 'Segmentation violation, 
> > internal compiler error ...' messages but was going on  
> ontil I got (this is
> > in stage 2)
> > ../../gcc/libgcc2.c: In function `__muldi3':
> > ../../gcc/libgcc2.c:368: Internal compiler error in
> > remove_unnecessary_notes, at emit-rtl.c:2897
> > Please submit a full bug report,
> > with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> > 
> > and stopped there
> > 
> 
> OFYI, I have tried to bootstrap gcc301 some days ago in a DOS 
> session of Win95
> and it fails in *exactely* the same way at *exactely* the 
> same line of function __muldi3
> of file libgcc2.c.
> This is completey independent of the amount of memory I have 
> used, *independent*
> of the memory modules used and *independent* of the 
> motherboard used. I have not tried
> to investigate this in depth because it has been argumented 
> that gcc301 is ok and
> that all this difficulty is a cyrix cpu peculiarity or a 
> cyrix / motherboard incompatibility.
> 
> Regards,
> Guerrero, Jaun M.
> 

Under W2K, using the same compiler (gcc-3.01) and tools I was able to build
the compiler but the process stops at libstdc++-v3, 
the reason being that the files that should have been copied to 
d:\djgpp.2\gnu\gcc-3.02\build.djg\i586-pc-msdosdjgpp\libstdc++-v3\include\i5
86-pc-msdosdjgpp\bits
were copied to the main directory (that is d:\) instead

(the -3.02 prefix is only to distinguish the other directory with a clean
copy of gcc-3.01 sources)

Perhaps the directory name is too long ?

The computer is equipped with Intel Pentium III 650 MHz CPU